Home / اخبار تکنولوژی / Forum tells mobile company, use centre to compensate Rs 29000 to complainant

Forum tells mobile company, use centre to compensate Rs 29000 to complainant

Forum tells mobile company, service centre to pay Rs 29000 to complainantReviewed by Admin on Apr 16Rating:

The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum has asked a emporium owners and a mobile association to compensate Rs 20,500 i.e. a cost of a product to a complainant.

The forum has also asked them to compensate Rs 3,000 as remuneration for ‘mental agony’ and ‘physical harassment’ to a complainant along with Rs 5,500 as costs of litigation.


The complainant, Vasudev Gupta, a proprietor of Sector 39, settled in his censure that on Jun 25, 2015, he purchased a mobile handset of HTC Desire 820S with IMEI 356059062236688 from National Watch Company in Sector 22. The watch had a guaranty of one year.

Gupta also purchased an word cover for detriment conflicting burglary or other kind of indemnification for Rs 1,299 to Syska Gadget Secure in Pune. After a integrate of months, a mobile handset used to tighten down in between calls. The internet also stopped working, and a phone became totally passed on Nov 15, 2015.

Gupta approached a certified use core i.e. Shivam Communications in Sector 11 in Panchkula on Nov 16, 2015, with a pursuit sheet. There a attendant kept a same and asked him to collect it after a integrate of days.

Thereafter, Gupta visited Shivam Communications a series of times, though a attendants put off a matter on one stratagem or a other. He eventually wrote an email to HTC India Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon, in this regard.

The complainant pronounced that he was repelled to see that he was given a check of Rs 15,934 and offering a bonus of 20 per cent on a correct of a handset with an e-mail. When he sensitive that a handset was underneath warranty, association officials pronounced a handset was passed due to ‘liquid ingress’.

According to a complainant, there was no glass accession in a mobile handset when he handed it over for repair. Subsequently, he sensitive Syska Gadget Secure about a problem. It has been purported that a association had sole a poor handset to him.

Alleging that a aforesaid acts volume to scarcity in use and astray trade practice, a complainant approached a consumer redressal forum. The conflicting parties did not seem before a forum notwithstanding notices by purebred post that led to ex-parte record conflicting them.

The forum held, “The mobile phone in doubt became passed within 5 months of a purchase. The complainant has placed on record a duplicate of a pursuit piece antiquated Nov 16, 2015 with that he handed over a phone in doubt to a certified use core i.e. Shivam Communications with a censure ‘auto energy off or destroy to arise up, arrangement not uncover and phone is dead’.”

“A tighten inspection of a pursuit piece reveals that no remarks of glass damage, as purported in a e-mail by HTC Company has been done by a use operative of Shivam Communications. Had there been any glass repairs to a mobile phone in question, afterwards a remarks per a same contingency have been done by a use engineer. Hence, it appears that a mobile phone in doubt competence have been pang from some vital problem that is not repairable and as such a mobile association has concocted a fake and whimsical story per a glass repairs to equivocate a guilt underneath warranty,” a forum serve observed.

پاسخ دهید

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *